Some good reasons not to read Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace:
- The footnotes. I thought Paul Auster was bad, but with almost 100 pages of footnotes, DFW makes him look like a beginner.
- I've heard the book is post modern, so I'll be obliged to look up the meaning of simulacrum and Derrida.
- A friend of mine who is doing a PhD on DFW pinched about an inch of the book's pages and said, "This bit's really bad, but it gets better afterwards."
- I like short books.
- Writers whose work I didn't particularly care for, such as Dave Eggers, like it.
- Writers whose work I admire, such as Chad Harbach, have read the book and said that DFW has done everything they wanted to do and done it better.
- The last time I played tennis I was in short trousers.
- I'm 41 years old and I'll probably be 42 before I finish it.
There are some good reasons to read it:
- The first scene blew my mind.
- I read Proust, or at least I read one book of À la recherche du temps perdu, which is surely the high water mark of impenetrable prose.
My aim is to read a bit, blog a bit.
I have the Abacus, 2013 edition, ISBN 9780349121086.
I have motivation.
No comments:
Post a Comment